Modular photonic quantum computing

"Interleaving: Modular architectures for fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing"

Published by Hector Bombin, Isaac H. Kim, Daniel Litinski, Naomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Fernando Pastawski, Sam Roberts, Terry Rudolph (PsiQuantum), 31st March 2021

Photonic platforms
Modular photonic quantum computing

Rapid progress has been made in recent years in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) - across theoretical foundations, architectural design and experimental implementations. Most of the proposed architectures are based on an array of static qubits, where relevant large-scale computation with for example superconducting qubits is expected to require vast numbers of physical qubits taking up a lot of space and control machinery. Directly translating that paradigm to photonic FTQC architectures, implies that photons serve as the ‘static qubits’ implementing gates and measurements. However, the implementation of long sequences required by FTQC protocols, becomes difficult to process as photons are short-lived, easily lost, and destroyed after measurement. This makes conventional FTQC description not suitable to photonic quantum computing.

Fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC) is an alternative to standard photon-based FTQC architectures that can overcome such limitations. In FBQC, quantum information is not stored in a static array of qubits, but periodically teleported from previously generated resource states to currently generated photons. Hence, even when the measured photons are destroyed, their quantum information is preserved and teleported accordingly. In this work, the authors present a modular and scalable architecture for FBQC, which can provide the computational power of thousands of physical qubits. The unit module of the architecture consists of a single resource-state generator (RSG), a few fusion devices, and macroscopic fiber delays with low transmission loss rates connected via waveguides and switches. The networks of such modules execute the operations by adding thousands of physical qubits to the computational Hilbert space for executing computation. The authors argue that, pragmatically, “a static qubit-based device and a dynamic RSG-based device (can be considered) equally powerful, if they can execute the same quantum computation in the same amount of time”. A single RSG is shown to be much more ‘powerful’ than a single physical qubit.

The qubits produced by RSGs are encoded as photonic qubits and are combined using a stabilizer code such as a Shor code. The photonic qubits are then transported by waveguides to n-delays, which delay (store) photons for n RSG cycles therefore acting as a fixed-time quantum memory by temporarily storing photonic qubits. This photonic memory is used to increase the number of simultaneously existing resource states available in the total computation space. Fusion devices further perform entangling fusion measurements of photon pairs that enter the device. Finally, switches reroute the incoming photonic qubits to one of the multiple outgoing waveguides. Switch settings can be adjusted in every RSG cycle, thereby deciding the operations to be performed.

In contrast to circuits in circuit-based quantum computation (CBQC), photonic FBQC uses fusion graphs to describe the execution of a specific computation. The authors review the structure of simple cubic fusion graphs using 6-ring graph states which is a six-qubit ring-shaped cluster state as resource states. Each resource state is fused with six other resource states allowing one fusion per constituent qubit of the resource state. Another direction being explored is interleaving, which involves allocating the same RSG to successively produce different fusion-graph resource states. Exploiting different arrangements of RSGs and using longer delay lines can lead to larger fusion graphs. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that interleaving modules with n-delays can increase the number of available qubits by n, but inevitably decrease the speed of logical operations by the same factor. To avoid that, it is recommended increasing the number of interleaving modules and investigating different arrangements.

These photonics-based FBQC architectures are not only modular and highly scalable, but are cost-efficient as well, since they reduce the cost of logical operations. Combining this with the interleaving approach further improves feasibility, where instead of million-qubit arrays of physical qubits, arrays of disconnected few-qubit devices can be turned into a large-scale quantum computer, provided that their qubits are photonic qubits. Such hybrid architecture repeatedly generates identical few qubit resource states from matter-based qubits, connecting them to a large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computer. Moreover, it also handles the classical processing associated with error correction along with providing high-capacity memory. As quantum technology evolves, larger number of high-quality qubits are going to be available, allowing a transition from small-scale FTQC devices to fully scalable devices. These early FTQC devices are expected to be similar in design to the current NISQ devices albeit much more powerful. Utilizing such approaches in photonic FBQC along with the developments in highly efficient photonic hardware can make the transition to large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computers a reality in the near future.